It was a long and varied experience, but in the end I came to two conclusions:
1) I am skilled enough that if I want, I could play Magic at a competitive level.
2) I don't want that.
I love playing Magic, and would have no objection to putting in the time and effort it would take to get my game to a professional level. And winning money by playing a game you enjoy is awesome. But I learned that I don't like sitting down to a game with the knowledge that I've got hundreds of dollars on the line. Some people may like the thrill of competition that offers, but for me it makes the game feel too much like work.
I'm glad I tried it and pleased with how well I did. I considere making day two alone quite an accomplishment for my first serious tournament, and I finished 75th after going in 3-0 my first draft pod. (I would have made Top 64 for $200 if my friend and I had gotten the math right and drawn our final round.) But at the end of both days I was tired and only staying in for the chance at money, which is not what I want my gaming to be.
The GP had some other fun stuff going on that I would have liked to see more of - we had quite a few high profile Magic artists and Richard Garfield himself. (Another friend from Willamette got to draft with Garfield's kids, which is a pretty awesome brag.) There are infinite people there to play or trade with, and the various dealers present some unique opportunities for buying/selling cards. Playing for the big money was a fun thing to try, but in the future I think I'll be the guy who takes my 1950+ rating over to the casual tables for EDH and cubing.
Maybe you should judge.
ReplyDelete@Troacctid:
ReplyDeleteI've definitely considered judging - it seems like a good way to get involved with the Magic community and I've got a very solid grasp of the comp rules. Maybe this blog post is evidence that I should do some more looking in that direction.
Well, good job in the GP and in learning more about your desired gaming experience. It was nice to meet you!
ReplyDelete